There are many potential root causes of conflict at work. We’ll
go over six of them here. Remember, anything that leads to a
disagreement can be a cause of conflict. Although conflict is
common to organizations, some organizations have more than
others.
Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\): Potential Causes of
Conflict
Causes of Conflict
Organizational Structure
Conflict tends to take different forms, depending upon the
organizational structure (Jaffe, 2000). For example, if a company
uses a matrix
structure as its organizational form, it will have decisional
conflict built in, because the structure specifies that each
manager report to two bosses. For example, global company ABB Inc.
is organized around a matrix structure based on the dimensions of
country and industry. This structure can lead to confusion as the
company is divided geographically into 1,200 different units and by
industry into 50 different units (Taylor, 1991).
Limited Resources
Resources such as money, time, and equipment are often scarce.
Competition among people or departments for limited resources is a
frequent cause for conflict. For example, cutting-edge laptops and
gadgets such as a BlackBerry or iPhone are expensive resources that
may be allocated to employees on a need-to-have basis in some
companies. When a group of employees have access to such resources
while others do not, conflict may arise among employees or between
employees and management. While technical employees may feel that
these devices are crucial to their productivity, employees with
customer contact such as sales representatives may make the point
that these devices are important for them to make a good impression
to clients. Because important resources are often limited, this is
one source of conflict many companies have to live with.
Task Interdependence
Another cause of conflict is task interdependence; that is, when
accomplishment of your goal requires reliance on others to perform
their tasks. For example, if you’re tasked with creating
advertising for your product, you’re dependent on the creative team
to design the words and layout, the photographer or videographer to
create the visuals, the media buyer to purchase the advertising
space, and so on. The completion of your goal (airing or publishing
your ad) is dependent on others.
Incompatible Goals
Sometimes conflict arises when two parties think that their
goals are mutually exclusive. Within an organization, incompatible
goals often arise because of the different ways department managers
are compensated. For example, a sales manager’s bonus may be tied
to how many sales are made for the company. As a result, the
individual might be tempted to offer customers “freebies” such as
expedited delivery in order to make the sale. In contrast, a
transportation manager’s compensation may be based on how much
money the company saves on transit. In this case, the goal might be
to eliminate expedited delivery because it adds expense. The two
will butt heads until the company resolves the conflict by changing
the compensation scheme. For example, if the company assigns the
bonus based on profitability of a sale, not just the dollar amount,
the cost of the expediting would be subtracted from the value of
the sale. It might still make sense to expedite the order if the
sale is large enough, in which case both parties would support it.
On the other hand, if the expediting negates the value of the sale,
neither party would be in favor of the added expense.
Personality Differences
Personality differences among coworkers are common. By
understanding some fundamental differences among the way people
think and act, we can better understand how others see the world.
Knowing that these differences are natural and normal lets us
anticipate and mitigate interpersonal conflict—it’s often not about
“you” but simply a different way of seeing and behaving. For
example, Type A individuals have been found to have more conflicts
with their coworkers than Type B individuals (Baron, 1989).
Communication Problems
Sometimes conflict arises simply out of a small, unintentional
communication problem, such as lost e-mails or dealing with people
who don’t return phone calls. Giving feedback is also a case in
which the best intentions can quickly escalate into a conflict
situation. When communicating, be sure to focus on behavior and its
effects, not on the person. For example, say that Jeff always
arrives late to all your meetings. You think he has a bad attitude,
but you don’t really know what Jeff’s attitude is. You do know,
however, the effect that Jeff’s behavior has on you. You could say,
“Jeff, when you come late to the meeting, I feel like my time is
wasted.” Jeff can’t argue with that statement, because it is a fact
of the impact of his behavior on you. It’s indisputable, because it
is your reality. What Jeff can say is that he did not intend such
an effect, and then you can have a discussion regarding the
behavior.
In another example, the Hershey Company was engaged in talks
behind closed doors with Cadbury Schweppes about a possible merger.
No information about this deal was shared with Hershey’s major
stakeholder, the Hershey Trust. When Robert Vowler, CEO of the
Hershey Trust, discovered that talks were underway without anyone
consulting the Trust, tensions between the major stakeholders began
to rise. As Hershey’s continued to underperform, steps were taken
in what is now called the “Sunday night massacre,” in which several
board members were forced to resign and Richard Lenny, Hershey’s
then current CEO, retired (Jargon, Karnitschnig, & Lublin,
2008). This example shows how a lack of communication can lead to
an escalation of conflict. Time will tell what the lasting effects
of this conflict will be, but in the short term, effective
communication will be the key. Now, let’s turn our attention to the
outcomes of conflict.
Outcomes of Conflict
One of the most common outcomes of conflict is that it upsets
parties in the short run (Bergman & Volkema, 1989). However,
conflict can have both positive and negative outcomes. On the
positive side, conflict can result in greater creativity or better
decisions. For example, as a result of a disagreement over a
policy, a manager may learn from an employee that newer
technologies help solve problems in an unanticipated new way.
Positive outcomes include the following:
Consideration of a broader range of ideas, resulting in a
better, stronger idea
Surfacing of assumptions that may be inaccurate
Increased participation and creativity
Clarification of individual views that build learning
On the other hand, conflict can be dysfunctional if it is
excessive or involves personal attacks or underhanded tactics.
Examples of negative outcomes include the following:
Increased stress and anxiety among individuals, which decreases
productivity and satisfaction
Feelings of being defeated and demeaned, which lowers
individuals’ morale and may increase turnover
A climate of mistrust, which hinders the teamwork and
cooperation necessary to get work done
Is Your Job at Risk for Workplace Violence?
You may be at increased risk for workplace violence if your job
involves the following:
Dealing With People
Caring for others either emotionally or
physically, such as at a nursing home.
Interacting with frustrated
customers, such as with retail sales.
Supervising others, such as being a
manager.
Denying requests others make of you,
such as with customer service.
Being in High-Risk Situations
Dealing with valuables or exchanging
money, such as in banking.
Handling weapons, such as in law
enforcement.
Working with drugs, alcohol, or those
under the influence of them, such as bartending.
Working nights or weekends, such as
gas station attendants.
Sources: Adapted from information in LeBlanc, M. M., &
Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Predictors and outcomes of workplace
violence and aggression. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87, 444–453; National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (1997). Violence in
the workplace. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from
www.cdc.gov/niosh/violfs.html; National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health. (2006). Workplace prevention strategies and
research needs. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2006-144/.
Given these negative outcomes, how can conflict be managed so
that it does not become dysfunctional or even dangerous? We’ll
explore this in the next section.
Key Takeaways
Conflict has many causes, including organizational structures,
limitations on resources, task interdependence, goal
incompatibility, personality differences, and communication
challenges. Outcomes of well-managed conflict include increased
participation and creativity, while negatives of poorly managed
conflict include increased stress and anxiety. Jobs that deal with
people are at higher risk for conflict.
Exercises
What are some primary causes of conflict at work?
What are the outcomes of workplace conflict? Which types of job
are the most at risk for workplace violence? Why do you think that
is?
What outcomes have you observed from conflict?
References
Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict:
Type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 44, 281–297.
Bergman, T. J., & Volkema, R. J. (1989). Understanding and
managing interpersonal conflict at work: Its issues, interactive
processes and consequences. In D. M. Kolb & J. M. Kolb (Eds.),
Hidden conflict in organizations (pp.
7–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jaffe, D. (2000). Organizational theory:
Tension and change. New York: McGraw Hill.
Jargon, J., Karnitschnig, M., & Lublin, J. S. (2008,
February 23). How Hershey went sour. Wall
Street Journal, pp. B1, B5.
Taylor, W. (1991, March–April). The logic of global business: An
interview with ABB’s Percy Barnevik. Harvard
Business Review, 69, 90–105.