When you buy merchandise online, shipping charges are usually
one of the negotiated terms of the sale. As a consumer, anytime the
business pays for shipping, it is welcomed. For businesses,
shipping charges bring both benefits and challenges, and the terms
negotiated can have a significant impact on inventory
operations.
Figure 6.13 Shipping Merchandise. (credit: “Guida
Siebert Dairy Milk Delivery Truck tractor trailer!” by Mike
Mozart/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)
IFRS CONNECTION
Shipping Term Effects
Companies applying US GAAP as well as those applying IFRS can
choose either a perpetual or periodic inventory system to track
purchases and sales of inventory. While the tracking systems do not
differ between the two methods, they have differences in when sales
transactions are reported. If goods are shipped FOB shipping point,
under IFRS, the total selling price of the item would be allocated
between the item sold (as sales revenue) and the shipping (as
shipping revenue). Under US GAAP, the seller can elect whether the
shipping costs will be an additional component of revenue (separate
performance obligation) or whether they will be considered
fulfillment costs (expensed at the time shipping as shipping
expense). In an FOB destination scenario, the shipping costs would
be considered a fulfillment activity and expensed as incurred
rather than be treated as a part of revenue under both IFRS and US
GAAP.
Example
Wally’s Wagons sells and ships 20 deluxe model wagons to Sam’s
Emporium for $5,000. Assume $400 of the total costs represents the
costs of shipping the wagons and consider these two scenarios: (1)
the wagons are shipped FOB shipping point or (2) the wagons are
shipped FOB destination. If Wally’s is applying IFRS, the $400
shipping is considered a separate performance obligation, or
shipping revenue, and the other $4,600 is considered sales revenue.
Both revenues are recorded at the time of shipping and the $400
shipping revenue is offset by a shipping expense. If Wally’s used
US GAAP instead, they would choose between using the same treatment
as described under IFRS or considering the costs of shipping to be
costs of fulfilling the order and expense those costs at the time
they are incurred. In this latter case, Wally’s would record Sales
Revenue of $5,000 at the time the wagons are shipped and $400 as
shipping expense at the time of shipping. Notice that in both
cases, the total net revenues are the same $4,600, but the
distribution of those revenues is different, which impacts analyses
of sales revenue versus total revenues. What happens if the wagons
are shipped FOB destination instead? Under both IFRS and US GAAP,
the $400 shipping would be treated as an order fulfillment cost and
recorded as an expense at the time the goods are shipped. Revenue
of $5,000 would be recorded at the time the goods are received by
Sam’s emporium.
Financial Statement Presentation of Cost of Goods
Sold
IFRS allows greater flexibility in the presentation of financial
statements, including the income statement. Under IFRS, expenses
can be reported in the income statement either by nature (for
example, rent, salaries, depreciation) or by function (such as COGS
or Selling and Administrative). US GAAP has no specific
requirements regarding the presentation of expenses, but the SEC
requires that expenses be reported by function. Therefore, it may
be more challenging to compare merchandising costs (cost of goods
sold) across companies if one company’s income statement shows
expenses by function and another company shows them by nature.
The Basics of Freight-in Versus Freight-out Costs
Shipping is determined by contract terms between a buyer and
seller. There are several key factors to consider when determining
who pays for shipping, and how it is recognized in merchandising
transactions. The establishment of a transfer point and ownership
indicates who pays the shipping charges, who is responsible for the
merchandise, on whose balance sheet the assets would be recorded,
and how to record the transaction for the buyer and seller.
Ownership of inventory refers to which party
owns the inventory at a particular point in time—the buyer or the
seller. One particularly important point in time is the
point of transfer, when the responsibility for the
inventory transfers from the seller to the buyer. Establishing
ownership of inventory is important to determine who pays the
shipping charges when the goods are in transit as well as the
responsibility of each party when the goods are in their
possession. Goods in transit refers to the time in
which the merchandise is transported from the seller to the buyer
(by way of delivery truck, for example). One party is responsible
for the goods in transit and the costs associated with
transportation. Determining whether this responsibility lies with
the buyer or seller is critical to determining the reporting
requirements of the retailer or merchandiser.
Freight-in refers to the shipping costs for
which the buyer is responsible when receiving shipment from a
seller, such as delivery and insurance expenses. When the buyer is
responsible for shipping costs, they recognize this as part of the
purchase cost. This means that the shipping costs stay with the
inventory until it is sold. The cost principle requires this
expense to stay with the merchandise as it is part of getting the
item ready for sale from the buyer’s perspective. The shipping
expenses are held in inventory until sold, which means these costs
are reported on the balance sheet in Merchandise Inventory. When
the merchandise is sold, the shipping charges are transferred with
all other inventory costs to Cost of Goods Sold on the income
statement.
For example, California Business Solutions (CBS) may purchase
computers from a manufacturer and part of the agreement is that CBS
(the buyer) pays the shipping costs of $1,000. CBS would record the
following entry to recognize freight-in.
Merchandise Inventory increases (debit), and Cash decreases
(credit), for the entire cost of the purchase, including shipping,
insurance, and taxes. On the balance sheet, the shipping charges
would remain a part of inventory.
Freight-out refers to the costs for which the
seller is responsible when shipping to a buyer, such as delivery
and insurance expenses. When the seller is responsible for shipping
costs, they recognize this as a delivery expense. The delivery
expense is specifically associated with selling and not daily
operations; thus, delivery expenses are typically recorded as a
selling and administrative expense on the income statement in the
current period.
For example, CBS may sell electronics packages to a customer and
agree to cover the $100 cost associated with shipping and
insurance. CBS would record the following entry to recognize
freight-out.
Delivery Expense increases (debit) and Cash decreases (credit)
for the shipping cost amount of $100. On the income statement, this
$100 delivery expense will be grouped with Selling and
Administrative expenses.
As you’ve learned, the seller and buyer will establish terms of
purchase that include the purchase price, taxes, insurance, and
shipping charges. So, who pays for shipping? On the purchase
contract, shipping terms establish who owns inventory in transit,
the point of transfer, and who pays for shipping. The shipping
terms are known as “free on board,” or simply FOB. Some refer to
FOB as the point of transfer, but really, it incorporates more than
simply the point at which responsibility transfers. There are two
FOB considerations: FOB Destination and FOB Shipping Point.
If FOB destination point is listed on the
purchase contract, this means the seller pays the shipping charges
(freight-out). This also means goods in transit belong to, and are
the responsibility of, the seller. The point of transfer is when
the goods reach the buyer’s place of business.
To illustrate, suppose CBS sells 30 landline telephones at $150
each on credit at a cost of $60 per phone. On the sales contract,
FOB Destination is listed as the shipping terms, and shipping
charges amount to $120, paid as cash directly to the delivery
service. The following entries occur.
Accounts Receivable (debit) and Sales (credit) increases for the
amount of the sale (30 × $150). Cost of Goods Sold increases
(debit) and Merchandise Inventory decreases (credit) for the cost
of sale (30 × $60). Delivery Expense increases (debit) and Cash
decreases (credit) for the delivery charge of $120.
Discussion and Application of FOB Shipping Point
If FOB shipping point is listed on the purchase
contract, this means the buyer pays the shipping charges
(freight-in). This also means goods in transit belong to, and are
the responsibility of, the buyer. The point of transfer is when the
goods leave the seller’s place of business.
Suppose CBS buys 40 tablet computers at $60 each on credit. The
purchase contract shipping terms list FOB Shipping Point. The
shipping charges amount to an extra $5 per tablet computer. All
other taxes, fees, and insurance are included in the purchase price
of $60. The following entry occurs to recognize the purchase.
Merchandise Inventory increases (debit) and Accounts Payable
increases (credit) by the amount of the purchase, including all
shipping, insurance, taxes, and fees [(40 × $60) + (40 × $5)].
Figure 6.14 FOB Shipping Point versus FOB Destination.
A comparison of shipping terms. (attribution: Copyright Rice
University, OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)
THINK IT THROUGH
Choosing Suitable Shipping Terms
You are a seller and conduct business with several customers who
purchase your goods on credit. Your standard contract requires an
FOB Shipping Point term, leaving the buyer with the responsibility
for goods in transit and shipping charges. One of your long-term
customers asks if you can change the terms to FOB Destination to
help them save money.
Do you change the terms, why or why not? What positive and
negative implications could this have for your business, and your
customer? What, if any, restrictions might you consider if you did
change the terms