9.3: Payback and Profitability Index Methods

Last updated
Save as PDF

Page ID: 150198

$ \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } $

$ \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} $

$ \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} $

$ \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} $

$ \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} $

$ \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) $ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$ $ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$ $ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$ \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$

$ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

$ \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$

$ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

$ \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$

$ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$

$ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$ \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$

$ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $ \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}$

$ \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow$

$ \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow$

$ \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } $

$ \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} $

$ \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } $

$\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}$

$ \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} $

$\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}$ $\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}$ $\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}$ $\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}$ $\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}$ $\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}$ $\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}$ $\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}$ $\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}$ $\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}$ $\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}$ $\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}$ $\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}$ $\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}$ $\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}$ $\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}$ $\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}$ $\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}$ $\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}$ $\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}$ $\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}$ $\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}$ $\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}$ $\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}$ $\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}$ $\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}$ $\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}$ $\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}$ $\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}$ $\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}$ $\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}$ $\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}$ $\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}$ $\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}$ $\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}$ $\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}$ $\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}$ $\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}$ $\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}$ $\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}$ $\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}$ $\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}$ $\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}$ $\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}$ $\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}$ $\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}$ $\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}$ $\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}$ $\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}$ $\newcommand{\lt}{<}$ $\newcommand{\gt}{>}$ $\newcommand{\amp}{&}$ $\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}$

While Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are the most rigorous capital budgeting tools, financial managers often supplement them with two additional techniques that emphasize practical managerial concerns—especially liquidity, risk exposure, and limited capital budgets:

Payback Period — how long it takes to recover the project’s initial investment.
Profitability Index (PI) — how much present value is created per dollar invested.

These methods are typically easier to compute and communicate than discounted cash flow metrics, which is one reason they remain common in real-world corporate policies. However, they must be used carefully because they can overlook important value-creation considerations.

9.3.1 The Payback Period

Definition: The Payback Period measures the number of years it takes for cumulative nominal cash inflows to equal the initial investment. It focuses on liquidity—how quickly the firm recovers its cash—rather than long-term profitability.

\[ \text{Payback} = \text{Years before full recovery} + \frac{\text{Unrecovered cost at start of year}}{\text{Cash flow during year}} \tag{9.3.1} \]

Decision rule: Accept the project if its payback period is less than or equal to the firm’s maximum acceptable cutoff period.

Example 9.3A — Basic Payback Calculation (Equal Annual Cash Flows)

Setup: Initial investment = $50,000; expected annual cash inflows = $15,000.

Step 1 (cumulative): After 3 years, cumulative inflows = $45,000.

Step 2 (fraction): Remaining amount to recover at start of Year 4 is $5,000, which is recovered in Year 4 as:

\[ \frac{5{,}000}{15{,}000}=0.33 \tag{9.3.2} \]

Payback Period: $3 + 0.33 = 3.33$ years. If the firm’s cutoff is 4 years, the project is accepted.

Example 9.3B — Basic Payback Calculation (Unequal Annual Cash Flows)

Important note: Not all projects generate equal cash flows each year. When cash inflows vary over time, the payback period is calculated by adding cash flows year by year until the initial investment is recovered. This step-by-step cumulative process is a major source of confusion for many students, so slow down and track the totals carefully.

Setup: Initial investment = $50,000. Expected cash inflows are:

Year 1: $10,000
Year 2: $18,000
Year 3: $22,000

Step 1 (cumulative totals):

After Year 1: $10,000 (still short by $40,000)
After Year 2: $28,000 (still short by $22,000)
After Year 3: $50,000 (investment fully recovered)

Result: The investment is recovered exactly at the end of Year 3, so the Payback Period = 3.0 years.

Mechanical process reminder: Payback is always computed as cumulative recovery plus (if needed) a fractional year. When cash flows vary, do not “average” them—add them year by year.

Common Pitfall: Why the payback method can be misleading

Although the payback period is simple and widely used, it has several important limitations that managers and students must understand before relying on it for investment decisions.

Ignores the time value of money. Basic payback treats all dollars as equally valuable regardless of timing, even though earlier cash flows are worth more.
Ignores cash flows after payback. Once the initial investment is recovered, the method stops counting cash flows, which can undervalue long-lived profitable projects.
Does not measure value creation. A project can have a short payback and still destroy value (negative NPV) if later cash flows are weak.
Relies on an arbitrary cutoff. Payback cutoffs often reflect managerial preference rather than economic logic, which can bias decisions toward short-term projects.

Managerial implication: Payback is best viewed as a liquidity screening tool rather than a value-maximizing decision rule. Firms typically use it alongside discounted cash flow methods as an initial filter, not as a final acceptance criterion.

Tip: Always state whether you are using basic payback or discounted payback. They often produce different answers, and graders will treat them as distinct methods.

9.3.2 Discounted Payback Period

The Discounted Payback Period adjusts for the time value of money by discounting each cash flow before summing. This corrects one major weakness of the basic payback rule, but discounted payback still does not measure total value creation because it continues to ignore cash flows occurring after the recovery point.

\[ \text{Discounted Payback} = \text{Years before PV recovery} + \frac{\text{Unrecovered PV at start of year}}{\text{PV of cash flow during year}} \tag{9.3.3} \]

Example 9.3C — Discounted Payback (Based on Example 9.3A)

Setup: Use Example 9.3A cash flows (CF₀ = −50,000; CF₁_–5 = +15,000) with discount rate $r=10\%$.

**Table 9.2.** Discounted payback schedule for equal annual cash flows at a 10% discount rate.
Year	Cash Flow ($)	PV Factor (10%)	PV of Cash Flow ($)	Cumulative PV ($)
0	−50,000	1.000	−50,000	−50,000
1	15,000	0.909	13,635	−36,365
2	15,000	0.826	12,390	−23,975
3	15,000	0.751	11,265	−12,710
4	15,000	0.683	10,245	−2,465
5	15,000	0.621	9,315	+6,850

The discounted inflows recover the initial investment between Years 4 and 5:

\[ \text{Discounted Payback} = 4 + \frac{2{,}465}{9{,}315} = 4.26 \text{ years} \tag{9.3.4} \]

Key Insight: Basic payback and discounted payback can lead to different conclusions

Teaching takeaway: This example shows why Payback and Discounted Payback can yield different conclusions. Basic payback suggests the project recovers its cost in about 3.33 years, but discounted payback shows that, once time value of money is considered, recovery takes longer (about 4.26 years). Discounted cash flow analysis is more appropriate because it reflects the economic reality that earlier cash flows are worth more than later cash flows.

Example 9.3D — Discounted Payback (Based on Example 9.3B, Unequal Cash Flows)

Setup: Use Example 9.3B cash flows (CF₀ = −50,000; CF₁=10,000; CF₂=18,000; CF₃=22,000) with discount rate $r=10\%$.

**Table 9.3.** Discounted payback schedule for uneven cash flows at a 10% discount rate.
Year	Cash Flow ($)	PV Factor (10%)	PV of Cash Flow ($)	Cumulative PV ($)
0	−50,000	1.000	−50,000	−50,000
1	10,000	0.909	9,091	−40,909
2	18,000	0.826	14,876	−26,033
3	22,000	0.751	16,522	−9,511

Interpretation: Under discounted payback, the project is not yet recovered by the end of Year 3 (cumulative PV is still −$9,511). If additional years of cash inflows exist, you would continue discounting and accumulating until the PV recovery point is reached, then compute the fractional year using the same “unrecovered ÷ PV of cash flow” logic.

9.3.3 The Profitability Index (PI)

Definition: The Profitability Index (also called the benefit-cost ratio) measures the present value of future cash inflows per dollar of initial investment. It is especially useful when firms face capital rationing and must allocate scarce funds across multiple competing projects.

Like the payback methods, PI has specific strengths and limitations. While PI incorporates the time value of money and can help rank projects when capital is scarce, it does not measure total dollar value created. As a result, PI should complement—rather than replace—NPV when making final investment decisions.

\[ \text{PI} = \frac{\sum_{t=1}^{T}\frac{\text{FCF}_t}{(1+r)^t}} {|\text{CF}_0|} \tag{9.3.5} \]

Decision rule: Accept if PI > 1; reject if PI < 1. A PI of 1.10 means each $1 invested produces $1.10 in present value benefits.

Example 9.3E — Profitability Index

Using data from Example 9.2A (NPV = $69,058; CF₀ = −530,000):

\[ \text{PI}=\frac{69{,}058+530{,}000}{530{,}000}=1.13 \tag{9.3.6} \]

Interpretation: The project generates $1.13 in present value for each $1 invested. Since PI > 1, accept.

BA II Plus Shortcut

          After computing NPV:
          PI = (NPV + |CF0|) / |CF0|

When capital budgets are limited, managers can use PI to rank projects and select the highest PI values until available funds are exhausted. However, if projects are mutually exclusive, the final decision should rely on NPV, since NPV measures total dollar value created.

9.3.4 Comparing the Methods

**Table 9.4.** Comparison of payback, discounted payback, and profitability index (PI).
Feature	Payback	Discounted Payback	Profitability Index (PI)
Primary focus	Liquidity	Liquidity + time value	PV per $ invested
Time value of money	No	Yes	Yes
Value creation measured?	No	No	Indirect (relative ratio)
Best use	Quick liquidity screening	Improved screening (still incomplete)	Ranking under capital rationing

9.3.5 Application in Practice

Companies rarely rely on only one rule. A typical policy may require that a project:

Has a positive NPV, and
Passes a Payback or Discounted Payback screen (e.g., recovery within 4 years), and
Maintains a PI > 1 when capital is rationed.

This multi-criteria approach balances short-term liquidity concerns with long-term value creation.

Practice Checkpoint

Project X requires $200,000 and produces $60,000 annually for 5 years. Compute its Payback, Discounted Payback (10%), and PI. What are the managerial implications?
Why might managers prefer the Payback method for projects with high uncertainty or limited forecasting accuracy?
If two projects have identical NPVs but different PIs, under what condition should the higher PI project be selected?

Suggested OER & Data Resources

TIP

Remember: NPV tells us “how much value,” while payback tells us “how soon cash returns.” Both matter to managers, but they answer different questions. Use payback to understand liquidity risk, and use discounted cash flow methods to determine whether the project truly creates value.

Search

Text Color

Text Size

Margin Size

Font Type