Search
- Filter Results
- Location
- Classification
- Include attachments
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/zz%3A_Back_Matter/20%3A_GlossaryExample and Directions Words (or words that have the same definition) The definition is case sensitive (Optional) Image to display with the definition [Not displayed in Glossary, only in pop-up on pag...Example and Directions Words (or words that have the same definition) The definition is case sensitive (Optional) Image to display with the definition [Not displayed in Glossary, only in pop-up on pages] (Optional) Caption for Image (Optional) External or Internal Link (Optional) Source for Definition "Genetic, Hereditary, DNA ...") "Relating to genes or heredity") The infamous double helix CC-BY-SA; Delmar Larsen Glossary Entries Definition Image Sample Definition 1 Code for Glossarizer
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/00%3A_Front_Matter/02%3A_InfoPageCross Library Transclusion template('CrossTransclude/Web',{'Library':'chem','PageID':170365});
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.01%3A_Introduction_to_American_Criminal_LawOne indictment (Bill 230), before us in the present appeals, charged that the defendant on May 4, 1953 ‘devising, contriving and intending the morals and manners of the good citizens of this Commonwea...One indictment (Bill 230), before us in the present appeals, charged that the defendant on May 4, 1953 ‘devising, contriving and intending the morals and manners of the good citizens of this Commonwealth then and there being, to debauch and corrupt, and further devising and intending to harass, embarrass and villify divers citizens of this Commonwealth and particularly one Louise Zivkovich and the members of the family of her the said Louise Zivkovich * * * unlawfully, wickedly and maliciously …
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/00%3A_Front_Matter
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/00%3A_Front_Matter/01%3A_TitlePageCriminal Law: An Integrated Approach
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.10%3A_Affirmative_DefensesBecause the evidence before the second Grand Jury included statements by Goetz that he acted to protect himself from being maimed or to avert a robbery, the prosecutor correctly chose to charge the ju...Because the evidence before the second Grand Jury included statements by Goetz that he acted to protect himself from being maimed or to avert a robbery, the prosecutor correctly chose to charge the justification defense in § 35.15 to the Grand Jury… When the prosecutor had completed his charge, one of the grand jurors asked for clarification of the term “reasonably believes.” The prosecutor responded by instructing the grand jurors that they were to consider the circumstances of the incident an…
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.04%3A_Adjudication_DecisionsWe have several times affirmed that identical language may convey varying content when used in different statutes, sometimes even in different provisions of the same statute…. “Where the subject matte...We have several times affirmed that identical language may convey varying content when used in different statutes, sometimes even in different provisions of the same statute…. “Where the subject matter to which the words refer is not the same in the several places where [the words] are used, or the conditions are different, or the scope of the legislative power exercised in one case is broader than that exercised in another, the meaning well may vary to meet the purposes of the law, to be arriv…
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.02%3A_Criminalization_DecisionsAt the close of the State’s case, defendant moved for judgment of acquittal on the charge on the ground that the State had not met its burden “to prove [he] voluntarily brought contraband into the jai...At the close of the State’s case, defendant moved for judgment of acquittal on the charge on the ground that the State had not met its burden “to prove [he] voluntarily brought contraband into the jail.” The judge denied the motion, finding the evidence sufficient to go to the jury “based on the evidence that it was on his person at the time he was booked into jail.” The judge allowed defendant to argue to the jury that no evidence was offered to show defendant engaged in a voluntary act, and i…
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.09%3A_Group_CriminalityBut the District Judge disagreed, instead telling the jury that it could convict if “(1) the defendant knew his cohort used a firearm in the drug trafficking crime, and (2) the defendant knowingly and...But the District Judge disagreed, instead telling the jury that it could convict if “(1) the defendant knew his cohort used a firearm in the drug trafficking crime, and (2) the defendant knowingly and actively participated in the drug trafficking crime.” In closing argument, the prosecutor contended that Rosemond easily satisfied that standard, so that even if he had not “fired the gun, he’s still guilty of the crime.” After all, the prosecutor stated, Rosemond “certainly knew [of] and actively…
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/00%3A_Front_Matter/04%3A_LicensingA detailed breakdown of this resource's licensing can be found in Back Matter/Detailed Licensing.
- https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Criminal_Law/Criminal_Law%3A_An_Integrated_Approach_(Ristroph)/01%3A_Chapters/1.06%3A_Crimes_Against_the_PersonIn Mullaney the charge was murder, which the Maine statute defined as the unlawful killing of a human being “with malice aforethought, either express or implied.” The trial court instructed the jury t...In Mullaney the charge was murder, which the Maine statute defined as the unlawful killing of a human being “with malice aforethought, either express or implied.” The trial court instructed the jury that the words “malice aforethought” were most important because “malice aforethought is an essential and indispensable element of the crime of murder.” Malice, as the statute indicated and as the court instructed, could be implied and was to be implied from “any deliberate, cruel act committed by o…