2.7: CRJ OER CJ CH 3.4 Multiple Choice Questions (23)
- Page ID
- 65348
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
A type of criminal defense where the accused claims that they would not have done the criminal act if it were not for substantial encouragement by police.
- Substantial Capacity Test
- Mistake of Law
- Parsons v. State (1887)
- Entrapment
A ____________________ and circumstances surrounding an event can sometimes be a defense to criminal charges.
- Entrapment
- Deadly Force
- Parsons v. State (1887)
- Mistake of Fact
A legal defense based on the idea that a small harm can sometimes be necessary to prevent a greater harm from occurring; another name for the necessity defense.
- Solicitation
- Involuntary Intoxication
- Justification
- Necessity Defense
An error as to the facts and circumstances surrounding an event can sometimes be a defense to criminal charges; a error of law is never an excuse.
- Entrapment
- Mistake Defense
- Mistake of Fact
- Solicitation
A criminal defense based on the logic that the defendant should not be held liable because he or she acted criminally due to an inebriation that the defendant did not cause.
- Imminent Danger
- Involuntary Intoxication
- M’Naghten Rule
- Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
A potential harm that is likely to occur at any moment.
- Self-defense
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Irresistible Impulse Test
- Imminent Danger
A plea that must be entered (in some jurisdictions) when the defendant is planning to use a “guilty but mentally ill” defense.
- M’Naghten Rule
- Irresistible Impulse Test
- Mistake Defense
- Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
An insanity defense test that asks if the defendant could or could not control his or her actions.
- Non-deadly Force
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Irresistible Impulse Test
- Insanity Defense
The crime of inducing another person to commit a crime, usually for money.
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Excuse
- Irresistible Impulse Test
- Solicitation
A type of criminal defense where the accused admits to the criminal act, but maintains that they are not blameworthy because of extenuating circumstances.
- Mistake of Fact
- Excuse
- Mistake Defense
- Substantial Capacity Test
A state of inebriation knowingly and voluntarily entered into; not a viable criminal defense
- Non-deadly Force
- Irresistible Impulse Test
- Duress
- Voluntary Intoxication
A criminal defense based on the idea that a person who commits a crime because of a mental disease or defect is not culpable.
- Entrapment
- Duress
- Justification
- Insanity Defense
Force that is not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury.
- Imminent Danger
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Mistake of Fact
- Non-deadly Force
The Model Penal Code test for insanity that includes elements of the M’Naughten rule as well as elements of the irresistible impulse test.
- Justification
- Coercion
- Mistake of Law
- Substantial Capacity Test
A legal defense based on the idea that a small harm can sometimes be necessary to prevent a greater harm from occurring; another name for the necessity defense.
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Parsons v. State (1887 )
- Non-deadly Force
- Voluntary Intoxication
The practice (usually criminal) of using force or the threat of force to gain compliance.
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Parsons v. State (1887)
- Duress
- Coercion
An important Alabama Supreme Court case decided in 1887 that established the Irresistible Impulse Test of insanity.
- Non-deadly Force
- Justification
- Parsons v. State (1887)
- Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
A criminal defense that allows for the use of force to protect one’s person from harm, as well as the protection of others.
- Self-defense
- M’Naghten Rule
- Coercion
- Involuntary Intoxication
A legal defense available to a person who does something against their will under threat of harm.
- Duress
- Self-defense
- Necessity Defense
- Mistake Defense
A legal defense based on a claim that the act, while usually criminal, was right under the particular circumstances.
- Necessity Defense
- Justification
- Imminent Danger
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
A____________is never an excuse.
- Mistake of Law
- M’Naghten Rule
- Deadly Force
- Coercion
An amount of force likely to cause serious bodily injury or death if used against a person.
- Parsons v. State (1887)
- Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
- Mistake of Law
- Deadly Force
A legal test of insanity that hinges in the defendant’s inability to know right from wrong; originated in an English court case in 1843, making it the first major test for insanity.
- Coercion
- M’Naghten Rule
- Lesser of Two Evils Defense
- Duress
- License: CC BY-NC: Attribution-NonCommercial