2.5: CRJ OER CJ CH 3.2 Multiple Choice Questions (20)
- Page ID
- 65346
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
Although there is no explicit _______________ in the text of the Bill of Rights, the Supreme Court has found an implicit right on several different occasions.
- Compelling State Interest
- Second Amendment
- First Amendment
- Right to Privacy
Punishments that are inhumane or violate basic human dignity; prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.
- Fair Notice
- Cruel and Unusual Punishment
- Compelling State Interest
- Freedom of Religion
A landmark SCOTUS decision that struck down a Texas sodomy law, effectively ruling criminal laws that prohibit homosexual sexual activity unconstitutional.
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
- Criminal Procedure
- Freedom of Religion
- Freedom of Assembly
“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
- Eighth Amendment
- Freedom of Expression
- Right to Privacy
- Clear and Present Danger Test
An unconstitutional type of legislative act that pronounces a person guilty of a crime.
- Void for Vagueness
- Freedom of Religion
- Fair Notice
- Bill of Attainder
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
- Criminal Procedure
- Second Amendment
- Void for Vagueness
- Freedom of Expression
A set of statutory provisions in some states that allow licensed citizens to carry firearms on their person in a manner not obviously visible to the public.
- Fair Notice
- Right to Privacy
- Concealed Carry Law
- Freedom of Religion
The basic due process requirement that the government give the public notice as to what acts are criminal; closely related to the concept of void for vagueness.
- Bill of Attainder
- First Amendment
- Fair Notice
- Clear and Present Danger Test
The doctrine by which appellate courts strike down laws that are not clear in what exactly they prohibit.
- Void for Vagueness
- Clear and Present Danger Test
- Criminal Procedure
- Ex Post Facto Law
An unconstitutional type of statute that criminalizes and act after the act has occurred.
- Fair Notice
- Freedom of Expression
- Ex Post Facto Law
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
The body of law that dictates how criminal cases are processed by the criminal justice system.
- Right to Privacy
- Criminal Procedure
- Freedom of Assembly
- Ex Post Facto Law
A test of constitutionality created by the SCOTUS that balances the interests of the government against the rights of the individual.
- Compelling State Interest
- Cruel and Unusual Punishment
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
- Bill of Attainder
- License: CC BY-NC: Attribution-NonCommercial