Internal controls are the systems used by an
organization to manage risk and diminish the occurrence of fraud.
The internal control structure is made up of the control
environment, the accounting system, and procedures called
control activities. Several years
ago, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
(COSO), which is an independent, private-sector group
whose five sponsoring organizations periodically identify and
address specific accounting issues or projects, convened to address
the issue of internal control deficiencies in the operations and
accounting systems of organizations. They subsequently published a
report that is known as COSO’s Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. The five components that they
determined were necessary in an effective internal control system
make up the components in the internal controls triangle shown in
Figure 8.3.
Figure 8.3 The Internal Control Environment.
(attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC
BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)
Here we address some of the practical aspects of internal
control systems. The internal control system consists of the formal
policies and procedures that do the following:
ensure assets are properly used
ensure that the accounting system is functioning properly
monitor operations of the organization to ensure maximum
efficiency
ensure that assets are kept secure
ensure that employees are in compliance with corporate
policies
A properly designed and functioning internal control system will
not eliminate the risk of loss, but it will reduce the risk.
Different organizations face different types of risk, but when
internal control systems are lacking, the opportunity arises for
fraud, misuse of the organization’s assets, and employee or
workplace corruption. Part of an accountant’s function is to
understand and assist in maintaining the internal control in the
organization.
Internal control keeps the assets of a company safe and keeps
the company from violating any laws, while fairly recording the
financial activity of the company in the accounting records. Proper
accounting records are used to create the financial statements that
the owners use to evaluate the operations of a company, including
all company and employee activities. Internal controls are more
than just reviews of how items are recorded in the company’s
accounting records; they also include comparing the accounting
records to the actual operations of the company.
For example, a movie theater earns most of its profits from the
sale of popcorn and soda at the concession stand. The prices of the
items sold at the concession stand are typically high, even though
the costs of popcorn and soda are low. Internal controls allow the
owners to ensure that their employees do not give away the profits
by giving away sodas and popcorn.
If you were to go to the concession stand and ask for a cup of
water, typically, the employee would give you a clear, small
plastic cup called a courtesy cup. This internal control, the small
plastic cup for nonpaying customers, helps align the accounting
system and the theater’s operations. A movie theater does not use a
system to directly account for the sale of popcorn, soda, or ice
used. Instead, it accounts for the containers. A point-of-sale
system compares the number of soda cups used in a shift to the
number of sales recorded in the system to ensure that those numbers
match. The same process accounts for popcorn buckets and other
containers. Providing a courtesy cup ensures that customers
drinking free water do not use the soda cups that would require a
corresponding sale to appear in the point-of-sale system. The cost
of the popcorn, soda, and ice will be recorded in the accounting
system as an inventory item, but the internal control is the
comparison of the recorded sales to the number of containers used.
This is just one type of internal control. As we discuss the
internal controls, we see that the internal controls are used both
in accounting, to provide information for management to properly
evaluate the operations of the company, and in business operations,
to reduce fraud.
It should be clear how important internal control is to all
businesses, regardless of size. An effective internal control
system allows a business to monitor its employees, but it also
helps a company protect sensitive customer data. Consider the 2017
massive data breach at Equifax
that compromised data of over 143 million people. With proper
internal controls functioning as intended, there would have been
protective measures to ensure that no unauthorized parties had
access to the data. Not only would internal controls prevent
outside access to the data, but proper internal controls would
protect the data from corruption, damage, or misuse.
Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Bank Fraud in Enid,
Oklahoma
The retired mayor of Enid, Oklahoma, Ernst Currier, had a job as
a loan officer and then as a senior vice president at
Security National Bank. In his
bank job, he allegedly opened 61 fraudulent loans. He used the
identities of at least nine real people as well as eight fictitious
people and stole about $6.2 million.4
He was sentenced to 13 years in prison on 33 felony counts.
Currier was able to circumvent one of the most important
internal controls: segregation of duties. The American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) states that segregation of
duties “is based on shared responsibilities of a key process that
disperses the critical functions of that process to more than one
person or department. Without this separation in key processes,
fraud and error risks are far less manageable.”5
Currier used local residents’ identities and created false
documents to open loans for millions of dollars and then collect
the funds himself, without any oversight by any other employee.
Creating these loans allowed him to walk up to the bank vault and
take cash out of the bank without anyone questioning him. There was
no segregation of duties for opening loans, or if there was, he was
able to easily override those internal controls.
How could internal controls have helped prevent Currier’s bank
fraud in Enid, Oklahoma?
Solution
Simply having someone else confirm the existence of the borrower
and make the payment for the loan directly to the borrower would
have saved this small bank millions of dollars.
Consider a bank that has to track deposits for thousands of
customers. If a fire destroys the building housing the bank’s
servers, how can the bank find the balances of each customer?
Typically, organizations such as banks mirror their servers at
several locations around the world as an internal control. The bank
might have a main server in Tennessee but also mirror all data in
real time to identical servers in Arizona, Montana, and even
offshore in Iceland. With multiple copies of a server at multiple
locations across the country, or even the world, in the event of
disaster to one server, a backup server can take control of
operations, protecting customer data and avoiding any service
interruptions.
Internal controls are the basic components of
an internal control system, the sum of all
internal controls and policies within an organization that protect
assets and data. A properly designed system of internal controls
aims to ensure the integrity of assets, allows for reliable
accounting information and financial reporting, enhances efficiency
within an organization, and provides guidelines and possible
consequences for dealing with breaches. Internal controls drive
many decisions and overall operational procedures within an
organization. A properly designed internal control system will not
prevent all loss from occurring, but it will significantly reduce
the risk of loss and increase the chance of identifying the
responsible party.
CONTINUING APPLICATION
Fraud Controls for Grocery Stores
All businesses are concerned with internal controls over
reporting and assets. For the grocery industry this concern is even
greater, because profit margins on items are so small that any lost
opportunity hurts profitability. How can an individual grocery
store develop effective controls?
Consider the two biggest items that a grocery store needs to
control: food (inventory) and cash. Inventory controls are set up
to stop shrinkage (theft). While it is not profitable for each
aisle to be patrolled by a security guard, cameras throughout the
store linked to a central location allow security staff to observe
customers. More controls are placed on cash registers to prevent
employees from stealing cash. Cameras at each register, cash counts
at each shift change, and/or a supervisor who observes cashiers are
some potential internal control methods. Grocery stores invest more
resources in controlling cash because they have determined it to be
the greatest opportunity for fraudulent activity.
The Role of Internal Controls
The accounting system is the backbone of any business entity,
whether it is profit based or not. It is the responsibility of
management to link the accounting system with other functional
areas of the business and ensure that there is communication among
employees, managers, customers, suppliers, and all other internal
and external users of financial information. With a proper
understanding of internal controls, management can design an
internal control system that promotes a positive business
environment that can most effectively serve its customers.
For example, a customer enters a retail store to purchase a pair
of jeans. As the cashier enters the jeans into the point-of-sale
system, the following events occur internally:
A sale is recorded in the company’s journal, which increases
revenue on the income statement. If the transaction occurred by
credit card, the bank typically transfers the funds into the
store’s bank account in a timely manner.
The pair of jeans is removed from the inventory of the store
where the purchase was made.
A new pair of jeans is ordered from the distribution center to
replace what was purchased from the store’s inventory.
The distribution center orders a new pair of jeans from the
factory to replace its inventory.
Marketing professionals can monitor over time the trend and
volume of jeans sold in a specific size. If an increase or decrease
in sales volume of a specific size is noted, store inventory levels
can be adjusted.
The company can see in real time the exact inventory levels of
all products in all stores at all times, and this can ensure the
best customer access to products.
Because many systems are linked through technology that drives
decisions made by many stakeholders inside and outside of the
organization, internal controls are needed to protect the integrity
and ensure the flow of information. An internal control system also
assists all stakeholders of an organization to develop an
understanding of the organization and provide assurance that all
assets are being used efficiently and accurately.
Environment Leading to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Internal controls have grown in their importance as a component
of most business decisions. This importance has grown as many
company structures have grown in complexity. Despite their
importance, not all companies have given maintenance of controls
top priority. Additionally, many small businesses do not have
adequate understanding of internal controls and therefore use
inferior internal control systems. Many large companies have
nonformalized processes, which can lead to systems that are not as
efficient as they could be. The failure of the
SCICAP Credit Union discussed
earlier is a direct result of a small financial institution having
a substandard internal control system leading to employee theft.
One of the largest corporate failures of all time was
Enron, and the failure can be
directly attributed to poor internal controls.
Enron was one of the largest
energy companies in the world in the late twentieth century.
However, a corrupt management attempted to hide weak financial
performance by manipulating revenue recognition, valuation of
assets on the balance sheet, and other financial reporting
disclosures so that the company appeared to have significant
growth. When this practice was uncovered, the owners of
Enron stock lost $40 billion as
the stock price dropped from $91 per share to less than $1 per
share, as shown in
Figure 8.4.6
This failure could have been prevented had proper internal controls
been in place.
For example, Enron and its
accounting firm, Arthur Andersen,
did not maintain an adequate degree of independence.
Arthur Andersen provided a
significant amount of services in both auditing and consulting,
which prevented them from approaching the audit of
Enron with a proper degree of
independence. Also, among many other violations,
Enron avoided the proper use of
several acceptable reporting requirements.
Figure 8.4 Change in Enron Stock Price. The Enron
scandal was one of the largest frauds in the history of modern
business. It was the main fraud that was responsible for creation
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as well as the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (PCAOB). (attribution: Copyright Rice University,
OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)
As a result of the Enron
failure and others that occurred during the same time frame,
Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to
regulate practice to manage conflicts of analysts, maintain
governance, and impose guidelines for criminal conduct as well as
sanctions for violations of conduct. It ensures that internal
controls are properly documented, tested, and used consistently.
The intent of the act was to ensure that corporate financial
statements and disclosures are accurate and reliable. It is
important to note that SOX only applies to public companies. A
publicly traded company is one whose stock is
traded (bought and sold) on an organized stock exchange. Smaller
companies still struggle with internal control development and
compliance due to a variety of reasons, such as cost and lack of
resources.
Major Accounting Components of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
As it pertains to internal controls, the SOX requires the
certification and documentation of internal controls. Specifically,
the act requires that the auditor do the following:
Issue an internal control report following the evaluation of
internal controls.
Limit nonaudit services, such as consulting, that are provided
to a client.
Rotate who can lead the audit. The person in charge of the
audit can serve for a period of no longer than seven years without
a break of two years.
Additionally, the work conducted by the auditor is to be
overseen by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB). The PCAOB is a congressionally established,
nonprofit corporation. Its creation was included in the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to regulate conflict, control
disclosures, and set sanction guidelines for any violation of
regulations. The PCAOB was assigned the responsibilities of
ensuring independent, accurate, and informative audit reports,
monitoring the audits of securities brokers and dealers, and
maintaining oversight of the accountants and accounting firms that
audit publicly traded companies.
Any employee found to violate SOX standards can be subject to
very harsh penalties, including $5 million in fines and up to 20 to
25 years in prison. The penalty is more severe for securities fraud
(25 years) than for mail or wire fraud (20 years).
The SOX is relatively long and detailed, with Section 404 having
the most application to internal controls. Under Section 404,
management of a company must perform annual audits to assess and
document the effectiveness of all internal controls that have an
impact on the financial reporting of the organization. Also,
selected executives of the firm under audit must sign the audit
report and state that they attest that the audit fairly represents
the financial records and conditions of the company.
The financial reports and internal control system must be
audited annually. The cost to comply with this act is very high,
and there is debate as to how effective this regulation is. Two
primary arguments that have been made against the SOX requirements
is that complying with their requirements is expensive, both in
terms of cost and workforce, and the results tend not to be
conclusive. Proponents of the SOX requirements do not accept these
arguments.
One available potential response to mandatory SOX compliance is
for a company to decertify (remove) its stock for trade on the
available stock exchanges. Since SOX affects publicly traded
companies, decertifying its stock would eliminate the SOX
compliance requirement. However, this has not proven to be a viable
option, primarily because investors enjoy the protection SOX
provides, especially the requirement that the companies in which
they invest undergo a certified audit prepared by CPAs employed by
national or regional accounting firms. Also, if a company takes its
stock off of an organized stock exchange, many investors assume
that a company is in trouble financially and that it wants to avoid
an audit that might detect its problems.
Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): The Growing
Importance of the Report on Internal Controls
Internal controls have become an important aspect of financial
reporting. As part of the financial statements, the auditor has to
issue a report with an opinion on the financial statements, as well
as internal controls. Use the internet and locate the annual report
of a company, specifically the report on internal controls. What
does this report tell the user of financial information?
Solution
The annual report informs the user about the financial results
of the company, both in discussion by management as well as the
financial statements. Part of the financial statements involves an
independent auditor’s report on the integrity of the financial
statements as well as the internal controls.
LINK TO LEARNING
Many companies have their own internal auditors on staff. The
role of the internal auditor is to test and ensure that a company
has proper internal controls in place, and that they are
functioning. Read about how the
internal audit works from I.S.
Partners to learn more.