Skip to main content
Business LibreTexts

10.13: The Spending Multiplier in the Income-Expenditure Model

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID
    47446

    • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Learning Objectives

    • Explain and demonstrate the multiplier graphically using the income-expenditure model

    In our initial discussion of Keynesian economics in the module on Keynesian and neoclassical economics, you learned about the spending (or expenditure) multiplier. Remember that a change in any category of expenditure (C + I + G + X-M) can have a more than proportional impact on GDP. The idea behind the multiplier is that the change in GDP is more than the change in expenditure. In its simplest form, the calculation for this is

    \displaystyle\text{Spending Multiplier}=\frac{1}{(\text{MPS} )}

    Try It

    https://assessments.lumenlearning.co...sessments/7577

    Showing the Spending Multiplier Graphically Using the Income-Expenditure Model

    We can show the expenditure multiplier graphically using the income-expenditure model. The original level of aggregate expenditure is shown by the AE0 line and yields an equilibrium level of GDP at Y0. Consider an increase in AE to AE1, which is shown by a parallel shift in the AE line. This could be caused by an increase in autonomous consumption, investment, government spending or net exports. The vertical distance between the two AE lines is the increase in aggregate expenditure. The new equilibrium level of GDP occurs at Y1. It should be clear that the increase in GDP from Y0 to Y1 is greater than the increase in expenditure from AE0 to AE1.

    The spending multiplier is defined as the ratio of the change in GDP (ΔY) to the change in autonomous expenditure (ΔAE). Since the change in GDP is greater change in AE, the multiplier is greater than one. Suppose the equilibrium level of GDP is $700 billion. If government spending increases by $50 billion, GDP  rises from is $700 billion (at Y0) to Y1 $800 billion (at Y1). Thus, the change in GDP is $800 – $700 = $100 billion. In this example, the multiplier would be $100/$50 = 2.

    The graph shows the multiplier effect in the expenditure-output model: an increase in expenditure has a larger increase on the equilibrium output.
    Figure 1. The Multiplier Effect in the Expenditure-Output Model. The power of the multiplier effect is that an increase in expenditure has a larger increase on the equilibrium output. The increase in expenditure is the vertical increase from AE0 to AE1. However, the increase in equilibrium output, shown on the horizontal axis, is clearly larger. Thus, the spending multiplier, ΔY/ΔAE, is greater than one.

    Try It

    https://assessments.lumenlearning.co...sessments/7578

    https://assessments.lumenlearning.co...sessments/7540

    CC licensed content, Shared previously

    10.13: The Spending Multiplier in the Income-Expenditure Model is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.