Skip to main content
Business LibreTexts

17.10: Ethics in Human Resources

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID
    47174

    • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Learning Objectives
    • Describe the human resource implications of ethics

    One woman is sitting at a desk with a laptop. Another woman is standing next to her and they are both looking at her laptop screen together. They are both wearing business attire.

    In an increasingly volatile business environment, an organization’s human resources may represent their most sustainable source of competitive advantage. Randy Conley, Ken Blanchard Companies’ Trust Practice Leader, considers the ability to build and sustain high levels of trust and engagement a critical leadership competency. Conley states that with trust, “commitment, engagement, loyalty and excellence become more than empty words in a company mission statement, they become reality.”[1]

    Of course, trust doesn’t just happen. According to Conley, trust is built and sustained by behavior that reflects four key elements: competence, integrity, care and dependability. Leaders who exhibit these behaviors cultivate a safe environment that prompts a high level of engagement and discretionary effort. Conley’s summary of trust-positive and negative behaviors is a good point of reference for building healthy and productive relationships at any level in an organization.

    Conley’s Trust Building and Trust Eroding Behaviors
    Behaviors That Build Trust Behaviors That Erode Trust
    Demonstrating role competence Not having or developing role skills
    Establishing a successful track record Being disorganized or unresponsive
    Acting honestly, ethically & legally Treating people unfairly
    Admitting mistakes Not recognizing & rewarding others’ contributions
    Asking for & accepting feedback Gossiping or not keeping confidences
    Listening to learn (open to influence ) Hoarding information
    “Walking the talk” Avoiding conflict and accountability
    Meeting commitments Not following through on commitments

    Trust is a particularly critical issue given changes in demographics and employee influence. The findings from global communications firm Edelman’s 2019 Trust Barometer survey[2] reflect a significant shift from trust in authority and social networks—for example, a person like me—to trust in local relationships and sphere of control. Key development: “my employer” has emerged as the most trusted institution. This is especially relevant for human resource management since it represents not only an opportunity, but an expectation. Globally, 75% of respondents indicated that they trust their employer “to do what is right,” versus a 57% vote of faith in NGOs, 56% in business in general and 47% in media. In presenting these results at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos in 2019, Edelman CEO Richard Edelman noted this sense of trust reflects a full-employment economy and the associated confidence that workers have the ability to influence corporate policy and procedures.[3]

    Practice Question

    https://assessments.lumenlearning.co...essments/17298

    For example, employees’ activism—#GoogleWalkout and sit-in—forced Google to drop its policy of forced private arbitration of sexual harassment, sexual assault and discrimination disputes. Airbnb, Facebook and eBay followed suit in ending forced arbitration of sexual harassment claims.[4]

    See image caption for a link to alternative text for this image.
    Google Walkout for Real Change informational flyer. Alternative text for the google walkout flyer can be found here.

    Google subsequently abandoned the policy of forced arbitration for any employer-employee disputes. What’s remarkable about these actions is the speed of organization and the effectiveness of the actions. For perspective, read the Cut article: “We’re the Organizers of the Google Walkout. Here Are Our Demands.”[5] In an article for CNBC.com, Technology Reporter Jillian D’Onfro observed that the “Google walkouts showed what the new tech resistance looks like, with lots of cues from union organizing.”[6] Specifically, Google employees tapped into the power of collective bargaining, using unionizing techniques and theatrics—for example, staging a San Francisco rally in a plaza dedicated to union leader Harry Bridges—without incurring the delays, compromises or political distractions of unionization or union representation. Indeed, one Google employee remarked that the speed of the walkout orchestration felt like “lightning striking.” D’Onfro also quoted Temple University professor Brishen Rogers, who specializes in the impact of technology on labor relations, saying “the numbers and level of coordination involved in the Google strike was unprecedented.”[7] To put the ethics-unionization connection in perspective, a study reported in the Journal of Financial Economics found that a one standard deviation increase in employees’ belief in their leaders integrity was associated with an increase in profitability and a decrease in the percentage of unionized workers.

    1. Conley, Randy. "Connecting the Dots: Trust, Leadership, and Engagement." Leading with Trust. January 3, 2018. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    2. "2019 Edelman Trust Barometer" Edelman. January 20, 2019. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    3. "Richard Edelman on the 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer." YouTube. January 22, 2019. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    4. Martinez, Didi. "Facebook, Airbnb and Ebay Join Google in Ending Forced Arbitration for Sexual Harassment Claims." NBC News. November 12, 2018. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    5. Stapleton, Claire, Tanuja Gupta, Meredith Whittaker, Celie O'Neil-Hart, Stephanie Parker, Erica Anderson, and Amy Gaber. "We're the Organizers of the Google Walkout. Here Are Our Demands." The Cut. November 1, 2018. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    6. D'Onfro, Jillian. "Google Walkouts Showed What the New Tech Resistance Looks Like, With Lots of Cues From Union Organizing." CNBC. November 3, 2018. Accessed July 18, 2019. ↵
    7. Ibid. ↵

    Contributors and Attributions

    CC licensed content, Shared previously

    This page titled 17.10: Ethics in Human Resources is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nina Burokas via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.