Skip to main content
Business LibreTexts

12.5: Compute Amortization of Long-Term Liabilities Using the Effective-Interest Method

  • Page ID
    62226
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Bonds Payable

    As you’ve learned, each time a company issues an interest payment to bondholders, amortization of the discount or premium, if one exists, impacts the amount of interest expense that is recorded. Amortization of the discounts increases the amount of interest expense and premiums reduce the amount of interest expense. There are two methods used to amortize bond discounts or premiums: the effective-interest method and the straight-line method.

    Our calculations have used what is known as the effective-interest method, a method that calculates interest expense based on the carrying value of the bond and the market interest rate. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require the use of the effective-interest method unless there is no significant difference between the effective-interest method and the straight-line method, a method that allocates the same amount of the bond discount or premium for each interest payment. The effective interest amortization method is more accurate than the straight-line method. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) require the use of the effective-interest method, with no exceptions.

    The straight-line method doesn’t base its calculation of amortization for a period base on a changing carrying value like the effective-interest method does; instead, it allocates the same amount of premium or discount amortation for each of the bond’s payment periods.

    For example, assume that $500,000 in bonds were issued at a price of $540,000 on January 1, 2019, with the first annual interest payment to be made on December 31, 2019. Assume that the stated interest rate is 10% and the bond has a four-year life. If the straight-line method is used to amortize the $40,000 premium, you would divide the premium of $40,000 by the number of payments, in this case four, giving a $10,000 per year amortization of the premium. Figure 12.5.1 shows the effects of the premium amortization after all of the 2019 transactions are considered. The net effect of creating the $40,000 premium and writing off $10,000 of it gives the company an interest expense of $40,000 instead of $50,000, since the $50,000 expense is reduced by the $10,000 premium write down at the end of the year.

    Three journal entries are dated January 1, 2019. The first shows a debit to cash for 540,000, a credit to bonds payable for 500,000, and a credit to premium on bonds payable for 40,000. The second shows a debit to interest expense for 50,000 and a credit to cash for 50,000. The third shows a credit to premium on bonds payable for 10,000 and a credit to interest expense for 10,000.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Premium Amortization Using the Straight-Line Method. (attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)

    Issued When Market Rate Equals Contract Rate

    Assume a company issues a $100,000 bond with a 5% stated rate when the market rate is also 5%. The bond was issued at par, meaning it sold for $100,000. There was no premium or discount to amortize, so there is no application of the effective-interest method in this example.

    Issued at a Premium

    The same company also issued a 5-year, $100,000 bond with a stated rate of 5% when the market rate was 4%. This bond was issued at a premium, for $104,460. The amount of the premium is $4,460, which will be amortized over the life of the bond using the effective-interest method. This method of amortizing the interest expense associated with a bond is similar to the amortization of the note payable described earlier, in which the principal was separated from the interest payments using the interest rate times the principal.

    Begin by assuming the company issued all the bonds on January 1 of year 1 and the first interest payment will be made on December 31 of year 1. The amortization table begins on January 1, year 1, with the carrying value of the bond: the face value of the bond plus the bond premium.

    On December 31, year 1, the company will have to pay the bondholders $5,000 (0.05 × $100,000). The cash interest payment is the amount of interest the company must pay the bondholder. The company promised 5% when the market rate was 4% so it received more money. But the company is only paying interest on $100,000—not on the full amount received. The difference in the sale price was a result of the difference in the interest rates so both rates are used to compute the true interest expense.

    Year, Cash Interest Payment, Interest on Carrying Value, Amortization of Premium, Carrying Value (respectively): January 1 Year 1, -, -, 0, 104,460 ; December 31 Year 1, 5,000, 4,178, 822, 103,638. There is a circle pointing to the Cash Interest Payment column indicating that it is Stated rate times Principal. There is a circle pointing to the Interest on Carrying Value column indicating that it is Market Rate times Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Amortization of Premium column indicating that it is Cash Interest Rate minus Interest on Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Carrying Value column indicating that it is Prior Carrying Value minu Amortization of Premium.Assets equals Liabilites plus Equity plus Revenue minus Expenses; T account for Cash showing 104,460 on the debit side, 5,000 on the credit side and a debit balance of 99,460 equals T account for Bonds Payable showing 100,000 on the credit side plus the Premium on Bonds Payable T account showing 4,460 on the credit side, 822 on the debit side and a 3,638 balance minus the Interest Expense T account with 5,000 on the debit side and 822 on the credit side with a 4,178 debit balance.

    The interest on the carrying value is the market rate of interest times the carrying value: 0.04 × $104,460 = $4,178. If the company had issued the bonds with a stated rate of 4%, and received $104,460, it would be paying $4,178 in interest. The difference between the cash interest payment and the interest on the carrying value is the amount to be amortized the first year. The complete amortization table for the bond is shown in Figure 12.5.2. The table is necessary to provide the calculations needed for the adjusting journal entries.

    Year, Cash Interest Payment, Interest on Carrying Value, Amortization of Premium, Carrying Value (respectively): January 1 Year 1, -, -, -, 104,460; December 31 Year 1, 5,000, 4,178, 822, 103,638; December 31 Year 2, 5,000, 4,146, 854, 102,784; December 31 Year 3, 5,000, 4,111, 889, 101,895; December 31 Year 4, 5,000, 4,076, 924, 100,971; December 31 Year 5, 5,000, 4,029, 971, 100,000. There is a circle pointing to the Cash Interest Payment column indicating that it is Stated Rate times Principal. There is a circle pointing to the Interest on Carrying Value column indicating that it is Market Rate times Prior Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Amortization of Premium column, indicating that it is Difference between Cash Interest Payment and Interest on Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Carrying Value column indicating that it is Prior Carrying Value minus Amortization of Premium.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Bond Amortization Table. (attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)

    Issued at a Discount

    The company also issued $100,000 of 5% bonds when the market rate was 7%. It received $91,800 cash and recorded a Discount on Bonds Payable of $8,200. This amount will need to be amortized over the 5-year life of the bonds. Using the same format for an amortization table, but having received $91,800, interest payments are being made on $100,000.

    Year, Cash Interest Payment, Interest on Carrying Value, Amortization of Discount, Carrying Value (respectively): January 1 Year 1, -, -, -, 91,800 ; December 31 Year 1, 5,000, 6,426, 1,426, 93,226.

    The cash interest payment is still the stated rate times the principal. The interest on carrying value is still the market rate times the carrying value. The difference in the two interest amounts is used to amortize the discount, but now the amortization of discount amount is added to the carrying value.

    Year, Cash Interest Payment, Interest on Carrying Value, Amortization of Premium, Carrying Value (respectively): January 1 Year 1, -, -, -, 91,800; December 31 Year 1, 5,000, 6,426, 1,426, 93,226; December 31 Year 2, 5,000, 6,526, 1,526, 94,752; December 31 Year 3, 5,000, 6,633, 1,633, 96,384; December 31 Year 4, 5,000, 6,747, 1,747, 98,131; December 31 Year 5, 5,000, 6,869, 1,869, 100,000. There is a circle pointing to the Cash Interest Payment column indicating that it is Stated Rate times Principal. There is a circle pointing to the Interest on Carrying Value column indicating that it is Market Rate times Prior Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Amortization of Discount column indicating that it is Difference between Cash Interest Payment and Interest on Carrying Value. There is a circle pointing to the Carrying Value column indicating that it is Prior Carrying Value plus Amortization of Discount.

    Figure 12.5.3 illustrates the relationship between rates whenever a premium or discount is created at bond issuance.

    Large arrow pointing up with the words “Stated Rate > Market Rate, Bond is issued at a premium.” Large arrow pointing down with the words “Stated Rate < Market Rate, Bond is issued at a discount.”
    Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): Stated Rate and Market Rate. When the stated rate is higher than the market rate, the bond is issued at a premium. When the stated rate is lower than the market rate, the bond is issued at a discount. (attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license)

    CONCEPTS IN PRACTICE

    Bond Ratings

    Investors intending to purchase corporate bonds may find it overwhelming to decide which company would be the best to invest in. Investors are concerned with two primary factors: the return on the investment (meaning, the periodic interest payments) and the return of the investment (meaning, payment of the face value on the maturity date). While there are risks with any investment, attempting to maximize the return on the investment and maximizing the likelihood receiving the return of the investment would take a significant amount of time for the investor. To become informed and make a wise investment, the investor would have to spend many hours analyzing the financial statements of potential companies to invest in.

    One resource investors find useful when screening investment opportunities is through the use of rating agencies. Rating agencies specialize in analyzing financial and other company information in order to assess and rate a company’s riskiness as an investment. A particularly useful website is Investopedia which highlights the rating system for three large rating agencies—Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch Ratings. The rating systems, shown below, are somewhat similar to academic grading scales, with rankings ranging from A (highest quality) to D (lowest quality):

    Rating Agencies8

    Credit Risk Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Fitch Ratings
    Investment Grade
    Highest Quality Aaa AAA AAA
    High Quality Aa1, Aa2, Aa3 AA+, AA, AA– AA+, AA, A–
    Upper Medium A1, A2, A3 A+, A, A– A+, A, A–
    Medium Baa1, Baa2, Baa3 BBB+, BBB, BBB– BBB+, BBB, BBB–
    Not Investment Grade Ba1 BB+ BB+
    Speculative Medium Ba2, Ba3 BB, BB– BB, BB–
    Speculative Lower Grade B1, B2, B3 B+, B, B– B+, B, B–
    Speculative Risky Caa1 CCC+ CCC
    Speculative Poor Standing Caa2, Caa3 CCC, CCC–
    No Payments / Bankruptcy Ca / C
    In Default D DDD, DD, D

    Table 12.5.1

    Footnotes


    12.5: Compute Amortization of Long-Term Liabilities Using the Effective-Interest Method is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.