6.5: Programmed and Nonprogrammed Decisions
- Understand the difference between programmed and non-programmed decisions.
Because managers have limited time and must use that time wisely to be effective, it is important for them to distinguish between decisions that can have structure and routine applied to them (called programmed decisions) and decisions that are novel and require thought and attention (non-programmed decisions).
Programmed Decisions
Programmed decisions are those that are repeated over time and for which an existing set of rules can be developed to guide the process. These decisions might be simple or complex, but the criteria that go into making the decision are all known or can at least be estimated with a reasonable degree of accuracy. For example, deciding how many raw materials to order should be a programmed decision based on anticipated production, existing stock, and anticipated length of time for the delivery of the final product. As another example, consider a retail store manager developing the weekly work schedule for part-time employees. The manager must consider how busy the store is likely to be, taking into account seasonal fluctuations in business. Then, she must consider the availability of the workers by taking into account requests for vacation and for other obligations that employees might have (such as school). Establishing the schedule might be complex, but it is still a programmed decision: it is made on a regular basis based on well-understood criteria, so structure can be applied to the process. For programmed decisions, managers often develop heuristics , or mental shortcuts, to help reach a decision. For example, the retail store manager may not know how busy the store will be the week of a big sale but might routinely increase staff by 30% every time there is a big sale (because this has been effective in the past). Heuristics are efficient—they save time for the decision-maker by generating an adequate solution quickly. Heuristics don’t necessarily yield the optimal solution—deeper cognitive processing may be required for that. However, they generally yield a good solution. Heuristics are often used for programmed decisions because experience in making the decision over and over helps the decision maker know what to expect and how to react. Programmed decision-making can also be taught easily to another person. The rules and criteria, and how they relate to outcomes, can be clearly laid out so that a good decision can be reached by the new decision maker. Programmed decisions are also sometimes referred to as routine or low-involvement decisions because they don’t require in-depth mental processing to reach a decision. High- and low-involvement decisions are illustrated in Exhibit 6.3.
Non-programmed Decisions
In contrast, non-programmed decisions are novel, unstructured decisions that are generally based on criteria that are not well-defined. With non-programmed decisions, information is more likely to be ambiguous or incomplete, and the decision maker may need to exercise some thoughtful judgment and creative thinking to reach a good solution. These are also sometimes referred to as non-routine decisions or as high-involvement decisions because they require greater involvement and thought on the part of the decision maker. For example, consider a manager trying to decide whether or not to adopt a new technology. There will always be unknowns in situations of this nature. Will the new technology really be better than the existing technology? Will it become widely accepted over time, or will some other technology become the standard? The best the manager can do in this situation is to gather as much relevant information as possible and make an educated guess as to whether the new technology will be worthwhile. Clearly, non=programmed decisions present the greater challenge.
The Decision-Making Process Although decisions makers can use mental shortcuts with programmed decisions, they should use a systematic process with non-programmed decisions. The decision-making process is illustrated in Exhibit 6.4 and can be broken down into a series of six steps, as follows:
- Recognize that a decision needs to be made.
- Generate multiple alternatives.
- Analyze the alternatives.
- Select an alternative.
- Implement the selected alternative.
- Evaluate its effectiveness.
Although these steps may seem straightforward, individuals often skip steps or spend too little time on some steps. In fact, sometimes people will refuse to acknowledge a problem (Step 1) because they aren’t sure how to address it. We’ll discuss the steps more later in the chapter when we review ways to improve the quality of decision-making.
You may notice similarities between the two systems of decision-making in our brains and the two types of decisions (programmed and non-programmed). Non-programmed decisions will generally need to be processed via the reflective system in our brains for us to reach a good decision. But with programmed decisions, heuristics can allow decision makers to switch to the quick, reactive system and then move along quickly to other issues.
- Give an example of a programmed decision a manager might face.
- Give an example of a non-programmed decision.
- What are heuristics, and why are they helpful?
- How are programmed and non-programmed decisions connected to the reflective and reactive systems in the brain?